Consensus Project Home



Home > Consensusproject.org > Table of Contents > Chapter VI: Training Practioners and Policymakers and Educating the Community >
34  
Evaluating Training   printable pdf printable pdf
POLICY STATEMENT # 34

Evaluate the quality of training content and delivery; update training topics and curricula annually to ensure they reflect both the best practices in the field as well as the salient issues identified as problematic during the past year.

(See Chapter VIII: Measuring and Evaluating Outcomes, for a more comprehensive discussion of assessing the results of policies and programs that are suggested by this report.)

Recommendations for Implementation

a.    Test whether trainees have effectively learned the material presented.
 

Some law enforcement, court, or corrections veterans may participate reluctantly in a training session, confident that they have "seen it before" or "done it all."  Administering a pretest at the beginning of the training session can challenge such beliefs.  Immediate post-testing of course content is valuable as well, in order to assess changes in attitudes and knowledge.  It might be useful to conduct a third test, six months after the training, to evaluate how training played out on the street, in case you need to make adjustments.  As a caution, while testing is important it can be considered counterproductive if participants think they have to memorize terminology.  Tests should address information that will inform and improve responses to people with mental illness in contact with the criminal justice system.

b.    Ensure that current national trends and facility-specific needs guide the training agenda.
 

New topics and recommendations for training are being developed across the country on a continuing basis. Mental health training curricula should be updated regularly in accordance with the best practices in the field.  Sources for current information can be obtained from such organizations as the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS) of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the National GAINS Center, the American Correctional Health Services Association (ACHSA), the American Psychiatric Association (APA), and the National Commission on Correctional Health Care (NCCHC).  Criminal justice training officials should use the experts within the mental health community to evaluate current training procedures.

Example:  NAMI Evaluation of National Institute of Corrections Training Programs

The National Institute of Corrections worked with NAMI to evaluate National Institute of Corrections training for mental health correctional teams from 22 different jurisdictions.  NAMI provided feedback to the corrections training personnel in charge of those training programs.

c.    Promote workshops and seminars on mental illness at conferences and professional associations.
 

Most members of the criminal justice system attend professional conferences and belong to professional associations.  This includes law enforcement line and staff, court officials, and corrections administrators and staff.

A number of organizations exist that provide training to court officials, including the National Judicial College, National District Attorneys Association, National Legal Aid and Defenders Association, National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies, and the American Probation and Parole Association, to name just a few.  Several organizations also provide training on topics for law enforcement, including the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), the Police Foundation, the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement (NOBLE), the Major Cities Chiefs' Association (MCCA), and the National Sheriffs' Association (NSA).  Organizations such as the Association of State Correctional Administrators (ASCA), the National Institute of Corrections (NIC), and the American Correctional Association (ACA) provide training geared to corrections administrators.

Many of these organizations have been including sessions on various aspects of working with individuals with mental illness at their regular meetings.  These organizations should consider the recommendations contained in this document when planning such sessions in the future.