Consensus Project Home



Home > About the Report > Table of Contents > Chapter VIII: Measuring and Evaluating Outcomes >
45. Collecting Data   Appendices
46  
Disseminating Findings   printable pdf printable pdf
POLICY STATEMENT # 46

Publicize program successes as appropriate to the media, public, and appropriators

Once agents of change have completed an evaluation, they should share the results of their findings with various audiences.  In most cases, disseminating information about the impact of the program is essential to build support for a new initiative, to facilitate the replication of a pilot project, or to engage additional partners.  This policy statement suggests three ways to accomplish these goals.   

Recommendations for Implementation

a.    Capitalize on existing networks of advocacy groups to publicize program results
 

By tapping its national network, an advocacy group, such as a local Mental Health Association or affiliate of NAMI (Alliance for the Mentally Ill), can be extraordinarily effective in spreading the word about a new and promising initiative. 

Example:  Crisis Intervention Team, Memphis (TN)

The Memphis CIT was established as a result of a collaborative effort among the Memphis Police Department and various leaders in the community, including members of the NAMI.  Training is an important component of the CIT initiative, and NAMI members play a key role in administering the training program for police officers.  NAMI hosts an annual awards dinner for officers serving on the CIT and has also been helpful in trumpeting the results that Professor Randolph Dupont has documented: the response time for a CIT officer on a crisis call averages 5 to 10 minutes, as compared with other models where police take 30 to 50 minutes.  NAMI's promotion of these and other data at its conventions and on its website has facilitated replication of the CIT model in communities across the country. 

b.    Advertise positive program results in local media outlets.
 

When the results of an evaluation confirm the value of a new initiative, policymakers and practitioners should publicize the data.  In this regard, press kits that briefly highlight the findings and provide contact information for program spokespersons can be extremely effective. 

It is important to identify spokespersons who the media or the public might not immediately associate with the issue.  For example, a mental health advocate or provider might be expected to talk about the value of en effective community-based mental health program.  On the other hand, law enforcement officials, corrections administrators, or other criminal justice practitioners who explain how effective mental health services have improved public safety can be particularly compelling. 

Example:  Trauma, Addictions Mental Health and Recovery (TAMAR) Program (MD)

Preliminary research regarding rearrest rates among women participating in TAMAR has been impressive.  Wardens and other correctional administrators of facilities in county jails where the TAMAR program has been established have made presentations for county commissioners and state legislators citing these data to help explain the value of the initiative.  Elected officials have responded by promoting the replication of the program and publicizing its value to the state and counties in public hearings. 

Example:  Partners in Crisis (FL)

Linda Gregory, the widow of a deputy sheriff shot and killed by Alan Singletary (a person with a history of untreated mental illness) and Alice Petree, Alan Singletary's sister, are members of Partners in Crisis, a coalition of leaders in the criminal justice and mental health system in Florida.  Partners in Crisis conducted public service announcements across Florida featuring Ms. Gregory and Ms. Petree who explained the value of access to effective mental health services. 

c.    Create clearinghouses at the state and local level that provide information regarding the availability of services people with mental illness coming into contact with the criminal justice system.
 

Clearinghouses can help to advertise new initiatives that are promising and spread the word about valuable lessons learned in other communities. 

Example:  Texas Council on Offenders with Mental Impairments

The Texas Council on Offenders with Mental Impairments is statutorily responsible for providing technical assistance and information to local and state criminal justice entities regarding alternatives to incarceration for those with special needs.  The council comprises individuals from throughout the state who represent every facet of local and state criminal justice systems.  These board members are responsible for collecting information from the field and bringing it to the council for review and response.

Establishing for one jurisdiction an organization that will serve as a clearinghouse around criminal justice and mental health issues exclusively may be unrealistic, but adding this function to an existing entity is often feasible.  For example, the mental health agency funding community programs or an entity or person reporting to the court (e.g., pretrial services, probation, mental health court staff) regarding the availability of community-based services could become a locus of information.

 

 
45. Collecting Data   Appendices