Consensus Project Home



Home > About the Report > Table of Contents > Chapter III: Pretrial Issues, Adjudication, and Sentencing >
Introduction: Pretrial Issues, Adjudication, and Sentencing   8. Consultation with Victim
7  
Appointment of Counsel   printable pdf printable pdf
POLICY STATEMENT # 7

Make defense attorneys aware of the following:  (a) the mental health condition, history and needs of their clients as early as possible in the court process; (b) the current availability of quality mental health resources in the community; and (c) current legislation and case law that might affect the use of mental health information in the resolution of their client's case.

When a case is filed in court an inquiry is typically made regarding the defendant's financial ability to retain an attorney.  If the defendant is found to be indigent, an attorney is provided.  If the defendant is found to have sufficient financial resources, he or she is responsible for hiring his or her own attorney.  Not surprisingly, most defendants in criminal cases are appointed counsel because they are found to be indigent.

The unique role that defense counsel plays for his or her client - spokesperson, translator, and court champion - becomes even more important when the client suffers from a mental illness.  There are three key issues - all defense related - addressed in this policy statement.  First, it is important that defense counsel have speedy access to existing mental health information about the defendant.  Information collected by law enforcement, pretrial services and other justice agencies, or from family members should be made available to the defense as soon as they are assigned or agree to represent a client.  Second, attorneys have a responsibility to know about the mental health resources in the community - both their quality and their availability - that might be appropriate for clients with mental health issues, both pre- and post-adjudication.  Third, the policy statement underscores the affirmative obligation of attorneys to be current as to laws that could affect their clients who have mental illness.

Recommendations for Implementation

a.    Ensure that defense counsel can identify the mental health status of their clients as soon as possible after appointment.
 

The American Bar Association Standards Relating to Providing Defense Services state,  "Counsel should be provided to the accused as soon as feasible and, in any event, after custody begins, at appearance before a committing magistrate, or when charges are filed, whichever occurs earliest."[1]  One of the first actions of defense counsel after appointment should be to identify those clients with severe mental illness.  This can be done by interviewing the defendant, and reviewing the police report and the information obtained by the pretrial services program.  At least one state, Georgia, has a statute that allows defense attorneys access to state mental health records with the consent of the client.   

It can also be done by listening to family members or others who may be in a position to provide useful information about the mental health status of the client.  Attorneys should be careful, however, not to divulge information about a client's mental health status to any of these parties without first obtaining the consent of the client. 

Example:  Public Defender's Office, Hamilton County (OH)

In Hamilton County, a defense attorney is assigned to the case as soon as it is determined that the defendant may have a mental illness and the case is continued to a special afternoon calendar.  The defense counsel consults with the defendant before a clinical assessment is conducted by a mental health clinician. 

The mental health system should work with the defense counsel to assure that counsel has all the information needed to effectively represent a client.

b.    Ensure that defense counsel can identify alternatives to incarceration in appropriate cases for their clients with mental illness.
 

In some jurisdictions it falls to a pretrial services program to identify and track programs in the community that could be used for referrals of defendants, and to probation departments to do the same for post-conviction alternatives.  This recommendation calls for the defense to be equally familiar with mental health resources in the local community.  Defense counsel should know  program admission criteria and requirements; required lengths of stay; confidentiality rules imposed by the program; clinical capabilities; availability; and costs.  Finally, defense counsel should be aware of the qualitative performance of such programs.  

Obtaining this knowledge may require access by defenders to expert services.  In many jurisdictions, the public defender's office has staff who assist attorneys in finding appropriate alternatives. 

Example:  Public Defender's Office, King County (WA)

In King County, social workers are assigned to the public defender's office to help defense attorneys identify and develop mental health treatment alternatives to incarceration for defendants with mental illness. 

In other jurisdictions - particularly small jurisdictions - defenders may have very limited resources.  Yet even then, at least one state has taken on the responsibility of providing expert services to defenders in all parts the state. 

Example:  Georgia Indigent Defense Counsel

In Georgia, much of the information regarding alternatives to incarceration for people with mental illness is catalogued by the Georgia Indigent Defense Counsel (GIDC), which serves as an information resource center for defense attorneys throughout the state.  The GIDC provides defense attorneys with seminars and publications addressing the special needs of clients with mental illness.  The GIDC is also available to defense counsel for telephone consultation on individual cases.

c.    Develop materials and training programs that cover recent legal holdings that might affect the client with a mental illness.
 

Defense counsel representing persons with mental illness must carefully consider how mental health information may potentially be used - not just in the instant circumstance but in future hearings involving the client as well.  Counsel must also be aware of the potential ramifications of actions being considered.  For example, advising a defendant to plead not guilty by reason of insanity to a relatively minor offense could expose the defendant to more extensive loss of liberty than in simply pleading guilty.  (See Policy Statement 29: Training for Court Personnel.)

d.    Make resources available to the family members and friends of people with mental illness to help them navigate the criminal justice system.
 

When a person with mental illness becomes involved in the criminal justice system, his or her family, friends, mental health service providers, and other advocates may want to help in a variety of ways.  Family members may want to inform the defense attorney about the defendant's mental health history, to advocate for the defendant's placement in a particular treatment program, or generally to help their loved one navigate the criminal justice system.  Advocates in some communities have developed resources for such situations. 

Example:  When a Person with Mental Illness is Arrested: How to Help, Urban Justice Center, New York City (NY)

Staff at the Urban Justice Center's Mental Health Project have developed a practical handbook for supporters of people with mental illness who have become involved in the criminal justice system.  The handbook provides general information about the criminal justice process (arrest, arraignment, meeting with counsel), relevant statutes, and advice for advocates on working with defense attorneys, as well as information specific to the New York City criminal justice system.

Determining What Is in the Client's Best Interests

A defense attorney representing a defendant with a mental illness can face difficult decisions in trying to determine what advice to the defendant would be in the defendant's best interests.  On the one hand, the attorney has an obligation to reduce the defendant's possible exposure to sanctioning by the criminal justice system by removing him or her as quickly as possible from its jurisdiction. To that end, the attorney may believe that the best resolution of a case where the evidence is strong is a quick plea of guilty and acceptance of a short jail term, perhaps even credit for any time served, and may make that recommendation to the court.  On the other hand, the attorney may recognize that the defendant will continue to be rearrested if his or her mental health needs are not addressed and that having a criminal record may make it more difficult for the defendant to obtain a job and to receive such services as public housing.  In that sense, the attorney may advise that the best course of action is to try to get the defendant accepted into a pretrial diversion program where he or she would be under the supervision of the criminal justice system while in mental health treatment, and where charges would be dropped upon successful completion.

There are no right or wrong answers to this issue.  Defense attorneys should present all possible consequences to their clients when discussing options for the resolution of the case.


[1] American Bar Association, ABA Standards for Criminal Justice:  Providing Defense Services, 3rd Edition, Washington, D.C., 1992, Standard 5-6.1, Initial Provision of Counsel.

Introduction: Pretrial Issues, Adjudication, and Sentencing   8. Consultation with Victim