Consensus Project Home



Home > Programs > Search Results >
PROGRAM TITLE: Multi-Jurisdictional Mental Health Court
AGENCY/ORGANIZATION: 2nd Judicial District Court
STATE: Nevada
YEAR ESTABLISHED: 2001
LEVEL OF JURISDICTION:
ISSUE AREA: Courts: Adjudication and Sentencing
POLICY STATEMENTS:
14. Adjudication
15. Sentencing
23. Maintaining Contact Between Individual and Mental Health System
BJA 2003 GRANTEE? Yes
DESCRIPTION  |  CHALLENGES  |  DOCUMENTS  |  LEGISLATION  |  Q & A |  BJA MENTAL HEALTH COURT PROGRAM HOME PAGE

Program Overview
The Nevada Mental Health Court is a multi-jurisdictional, community-based program that provides court supervision and services to mentally ill offenders through cooperation of state, county, and local non-profit service agencies to promote engagement in treatment, improve quality of life, decrease recidivism, and increase community safety and awareness.

Program Contact:
EJ Maldonado   (Ej.Maldonado@washoecourts.us)
Pretrial Services Officer II
75 Court Street
Reno, Nevada 89520
      Program Stakeholders:
This program does not yet have program stakeholders

Register/Log In to sign up as a stakeholder.
[What is a stakeholder?] 

>> Q & A


Recent Dialogue
Question for Everyone
EJ, my question is about graduation criteria, benchmarks, completion of the MHC program but not graduating, etc. Can you share any written guidelines your program uses around the graduation process and event? Thanks.
  - Lois Smith    06/14/06 09:41 AM EST




Program Description
Established in 2001 by District Judge Peter I. Breen, the Mental Health Court is one of five specialty courts in the 2nd Judicial District Court that focuses on providing mentally ill defendants with the opportunity to receive community-based, outpatient treatment and services through local providers while participating in a court structured program. Participants, with the assistance of court personnel and mental health clinicians, develop a plan of care that specifically targets their needs to achieve independence and a high quality of life through outpatient, psychiatric rehabilitation services, supportive living arrangements, co-occurring disorders treatment, and various other supportive services throughout the greater Northern Nevada area.

Court conditions are also incorporated into their plan of care. These conditions can vary from random drug and alcohol testing, in-person check-ins with Court Services, regular court dates ranging from one to four weeks, standing appointments with Parole and Probation, as well as, making appointments with other service agencies.

Throughout their time in the Mental Health Court Program, participants are encouraged to engage in treatment and services on an ongoing basis. To do this, the court uses the technique of therapeutic jurisprudence, which is the active role the presiding judge plays in both the plan of care for each participant and the overall building of rapport between participant and court.

Outcome Data
The mental health court collects statistics on its operations. To view statistics from FY 2004 - 2005, please visit http://consensusproject.org/downloads/NV-MHC-stats.pdf.

Challenges / Areas for Improvement Identified
(1) Development of a formal orientation component to our program, (2) Continued development and fine tuning of our aftercare program, (3) ongoing updates to our handbook, (4) continued growth and understanding of program needs, participant needs, and resources available. We always find that there are ways to improve on our program no matter how much success we have.

Documents
Mental Health Court Handbook

Relevant Legislation
Enabling legislation in 2001 (SB366/SB6, NRS 176A.250,255,260,265) established the Mental Health Court at the 2nd Judicial District Court in Reno, Nevada.



>> Back to top of page
  
Register/Log In
to join the dialogue.



Staff from the Consensus Project, GAINS EBP Center, and GAINS TAPA Center have not conducted an empirical evaluation of any of the profiles provided in the directory. Accordingly, the Consensus Project, GAINS EBP, and GAINS TAPA do not promote any of these programs as "models" or "best practices." Nor does the directory reflect an inventory of all relevant efforts underway across the country. Administrators of the programs included in the directory are largely responsible for maintaining information about their initiative current. Accordingly, staff cannot guarantee that the information in the directory is completely current.

Terms of Use    |    Privacy Policy    |